Övüsi Grammar: Difference between revisions
(→Verbs) |
(→Verbs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
Verbs in Övüsi show agreement with subjects in person and number in the first person and sometimes in the imperative, and only in person in the second and third person. Each verb possesses three stems: imperfect, perfect, and future. Verbs can be either dynamic and stative, and they differ their available modes. The modes are indicative, passive, and potential, with the passive being absent for stative verbs. A copula serves emphatic, negating, and equational functions. | Verbs in Övüsi show agreement with subjects in person and number in the first person and sometimes in the imperative, and only in person in the second and third person. Each verb possesses three stems: imperfect, perfect, and future. Verbs can be either dynamic and stative, and they differ their available modes. The modes are indicative, passive, and potential, with the passive being absent for stative verbs. A copula serves emphatic, negating, and equational functions. | ||
For vowel-final verbs, the stems for imperfect, perfect, and future are ''-i'', ''-has'', and the bare stem, respectively. Suffixes are added in the three modes, and agreement affixes may further modify the form. Depending on whether or not the agreement suffixes are added the end of the form changes. The first item in each pair are how the form ends if nothing is added. Consider the example of the vowel-final verb ''mikaa,'' meaning "to say," for which the paradigm is shown below: | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
* ''Kenie mikaithorï.'' "I can say it." The third-person pronoun ''kenie'' is in the accusative, and the verb is in the imperfect potential with a first person singular subject agreement suffix. | * ''Kenie mikaithorï.'' "I can say it." The third-person pronoun ''kenie'' is in the accusative, and the verb is in the imperfect potential with a first person singular subject agreement suffix. | ||
* ''Kenie mikaithou shï!'' "I must say it!" The emphatic copula is used, expressing what can be interpreted as "must". Here, | * ''Kenie mikaithou shï!'' "I must say it!" The emphatic copula is used, expressing what can be interpreted as "must". Here, a form of ''mikaa'' without the subject agreement suffix is used. | ||
[[Category:Övüsi language|Grammar]] | [[Category:Övüsi language|Grammar]] | ||
[[Category:Grammar pages]] | [[Category:Grammar pages]] |
Latest revision as of 04:17, 13 November 2023
Övüsi is an inflected or fusional language. The language is strongly head-final and has subject-object-verb (SOV) word order. Nouns are inflected for number and case, and verbs for tense, aspect, and mode, as well as subject agreement for person and sometimes number.
Nouns
Nouns decline for number and case. There are two numbers: singular and plural. There are thirteen cases in total. Noun declensions in Övüsi are based on whether their original forms ended in vowels or consonants. At the current stage of the language, words cannot end in a consonant. The declensions are extensive, but the following example declension provides at least some insight into the system:
Singular | Plural | Meaning | |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | thuoke | thuoki | bird(s) |
Accusative | thuokie | thuokii | bird(s) (direct object) |
Genitive | thuoka | thuokai | bird’s/birds’ |
Instrumental | thuoku | thuokï | with the bird(s) |
Locative | thuokö | thuokü | near the bird(s) |
Ablative | thuokau | thuokavi | away from the bird(s) |
Allative | thuokaalou | thuokaalli | towards the bird(s) |
Inessive | thuokannö | thuokannü | inside the bird(s) |
Illative | thuokou | thuokoli | into the bird(s) |
Elative | thuokannau | thuokannavi | out of the bird(s) |
Perlative | thuokausu | thuokausï | by way of the bird(s) |
Aversive | thuokasshu | thuokasshï | avoiding the bird(s) |
Vocative | thuokuo | thuokorii | O, bird(s)! |
Verbs
Verbs in Övüsi show agreement with subjects in person and number in the first person and sometimes in the imperative, and only in person in the second and third person. Each verb possesses three stems: imperfect, perfect, and future. Verbs can be either dynamic and stative, and they differ their available modes. The modes are indicative, passive, and potential, with the passive being absent for stative verbs. A copula serves emphatic, negating, and equational functions.
For vowel-final verbs, the stems for imperfect, perfect, and future are -i, -has, and the bare stem, respectively. Suffixes are added in the three modes, and agreement affixes may further modify the form. Depending on whether or not the agreement suffixes are added the end of the form changes. The first item in each pair are how the form ends if nothing is added. Consider the example of the vowel-final verb mikaa, meaning "to say," for which the paradigm is shown below:
Vowel-final | Imperfect | Perfect | Future |
---|---|---|---|
Indicative | mikaishi(i/m-) | mikahassi(i/m-) | mikasi(i/m-) |
Passive | mikaifa(a/s-) | mikahaffa(a/s-) | mikafa(a/s-) |
Potential | mikaitho(u/r-) | mikahattho(u/r-) | mikatho(u/r-) |
Infinitive | mikaa |
The following table illustrates the agreement paradigm:
Subject agreement | Singular | Plural |
---|---|---|
First person | -ï | -uji |
Second person | -au | |
Third person | -e | |
Imperative | -uo | -orii |
Two examples which highlight the use of agreement markers are shown as follows:
- Kenie mikaithorï. "I can say it." The third-person pronoun kenie is in the accusative, and the verb is in the imperfect potential with a first person singular subject agreement suffix.
- Kenie mikaithou shï! "I must say it!" The emphatic copula is used, expressing what can be interpreted as "must". Here, a form of mikaa without the subject agreement suffix is used.