Na: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added Trigedasleng.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
#:: None but the one chosen by the spirit '''can''' rule. | #:: None but the one chosen by the spirit '''can''' rule. | ||
#::: -''Aden'' (''[[The 100]]'', [[Season_3_The_100_Dialogue#Episode_304|Episode 304]]) | #::: -''Aden'' (''[[The 100]]'', [[Season_3_The_100_Dialogue#Episode_304|Episode 304]]) | ||
====Creation and Usage Notes==== | |||
{{djpnotes|quote=The idea here is the reduced form of "can" kind of merged with what was left of the future auxiliary. The future auxiliary form is obvious enough, and there was kind of an epenthetic schwa with the "can" form—and the forms were similar enough that they simply merged. It's actually worked out quite well! | |||
-''[[User:Djp|David J. Peterson]]'' 18:33, 10 September 2020 (PDT)}} | |||
===Etymology 3=== | ===Etymology 3=== | ||
| Line 44: | Line 50: | ||
====Creation and Usage Notes==== | ====Creation and Usage Notes==== | ||
{{djpnotes|quote= | {{djpnotes|quote=Now the connective particle comes from the same thing the "na" part of "gonna" comes from, except it extends to other situations, e.g. "I'm writing to tell you" becomes "I'm writing 'a tell you". It's common enough in speech, but with everything else, it simply merged into one polyfunctional particle. | ||
Now the connective particle comes from the same thing the "na" part of "gonna" comes from, except it extends to other situations, e.g. "I'm writing to tell you" becomes "I'm writing 'a tell you". It's common enough in speech, but with everything else, it simply merged into one polyfunctional particle. | |||
-''[[User:Djp|David J. Peterson]]'' 18: | -''[[User:Djp|David J. Peterson]]'' 18:33, 10 September 2020 (PDT)}} | ||
{{lexeme|Yulish}} | {{lexeme|Yulish}} | ||
Revision as of 17:33, 10 September 2020
Trigedasleng
Etymology 1
Pronunciation
Particle
na
- (auxiliary) will, going to (future tense)
Etymology 2
Pronunciation
Particle
na
- (auxiliary) can, be able to
Creation and Usage Notes
| The idea here is the reduced form of "can" kind of merged with what was left of the future auxiliary. The future auxiliary form is obvious enough, and there was kind of an epenthetic schwa with the "can" form—and the forms were similar enough that they simply merged. It's actually worked out quite well!
-David J. Peterson 18:33, 10 September 2020 (PDT) |
Etymology 3
Pronunciation
Particle
na
- (connective particle) to, in order to
Creation and Usage Notes
| Now the connective particle comes from the same thing the "na" part of "gonna" comes from, except it extends to other situations, e.g. "I'm writing to tell you" becomes "I'm writing 'a tell you". It's common enough in speech, but with everything else, it simply merged into one polyfunctional particle.
-David J. Peterson 18:33, 10 September 2020 (PDT) |
Yulish
Etymology
| From an invisible proto-language. |
|---|
| The etymology of this word comes from an invisible proto-language. If you're confident you know the etymology, feel free to add it, but reader beware should the etymology be added by someone other than the creator of the language! |
Pronunciation
Preposition
na
- (comitative) with (co-occurs with a noun in the objective)
- (topical) with respect to, regarding, concerning (co-occurs with a noun in the objective)
Derived Terms
Categories:
- Trigedasleng terms inherited from English
- Trigedasleng terms derived from English
- Trigedasleng terms with IPA pronunciation
- Trigedasleng lemmas
- Trigedasleng particles
- Trigedasleng auxiliary verbs
- Trigedasleng terms with creation and usage notes
- Yulish terms with IPA pronunciation
- Yulish lemmas
- Yulish prepositions